Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Sci Med Sport ; 2024 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664149

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This was a pilot study that examined the relationship between nutrition knowledge and risk for low energy availability (LEA) in NCAA athletes. METHODS: Athletes (64.4 % female, 35.6 % male) completed the Abridged Nutrition for Sport Knowledge Questionnaire (A-NSKQ) and either the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) or Male Athlete Triad (MAT) screening questions. RESULTS: Females at risk for LEA had higher nutrition knowledge, demonstrated by higher A-NSKQ scores, than those classified as low risk (16.5 vs 14.5, p = 0.01). There was a very weak correlation between MAT and A-NSKQ scores (R2 = 0.012).

2.
Healthc (Amst) ; 9(4): 100577, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34411923

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Organizations have a key role to play in supporting healthcare workers (HCWs) and mitigating stress during COVID-19. We aimed to understand whether perceptions of support and communication by local leadership were associated with reduced reports of stress and burnout among frontline HCWs. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional surveys embedded within emergency department (ED) workflow during the first wave of COVID-19 from April 9, 2020 to June 15th, 2020 within three EDs of a multisite health system in the Northeast United States. All ED HCWs were administered electronic surveys during shift via text message. We simultaneously conducted 64 qualitative interviews to better characterize and validate survey responses. Primary survey outcomes were levels of work stress and burnout. RESULTS: Over 10 week study, 327 of 431 (76%) frontline HCWs responded to at least one round of the survey. More useful communication mediated through higher perception of support was significantly associated with lower work stress (B = -0.33, p < 0.001) and burnout (B = -7.84, p < 0.001). A one-point increase on the communication Likert scale was associated with a 9% reduction in stress and a 19% reduction in burnout. Three themes related to effective crisis communication during COVID-19 emerged in interviews: (1) information consolidation prior to dissemination, (2) consistency of communication, and (3) bi-directional communication. CONCLUSION: This work suggests that effective local leadership communication, characterized by information consolidation, consistency, and bi-directionality, leads to higher perceptions of support and lower stress and burnout among ED frontline workers. As the pandemic continues, these results present an evidence-based framework for leaders to support frontline HCWs through effective crisis communication.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Communication , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Personnel , Humans , Leadership , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J Surg Educ ; 78(4): 1305-1311, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349566

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Orthopedic surgery is one of the specialties with the lowest number of women residents and practicing surgeons. The gender discrepancy in orthopedic residency training may drive a competency bias. We asked whether female orthopedic surgery residents score themselves lower on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones than their male counterparts, and lower than their faculty evaluators. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of ACGME Milestone data from faculty and residents over a 4-year period. The data were analyzed using a snapshot of PGY2 (n = 20 residents) and PGY4 (n = 19 residents) scores, and using a Generalized Estimation Equation (GEE) to account for additional data points from the same residents over the 4-year data collection period. SETTING: Assessment scores were compiled from a single orthopedic surgery residency at Oregon Health & Science University from 2014 to 2017. PARTICIPANTS: The residency program has 5 residents in each program year (PGY1 through PGY5); a total of 25 residents during each year of the study were included. RESULTS: On average, female residents scored themselves lower than both their male counterparts and their faculty mentors. Female PGY2 self-evaluation scores were lower than males in both patient care (p = 0.005) and medical knowledge (p < 0.001). When the GEE model was applied to 99 responses from 41 residents over a 4-year period, there were no gender-related differences in resident self-evaluation scores and in faculty scores of male and female residents, with the exception of meniscal tear. For this milestone, faculty rated female residents lower than males. Furthermore, the differences between faculty evaluation scores and resident self-evaluation scores were significantly lower for males than for females for 4 of the clinical domains, as well as the systems-based practice domains of cost and communication. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate female residents are at risk for a competency bias during training, as reflected by evaluations using the ACGME Milestones.


Subject(s)
General Surgery , Internship and Residency , Accreditation , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate , Female , General Surgery/education , Humans , Male , Oregon , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...